Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:09
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
A guide to sky-watching from summer to autumn - The Washington Post
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is your first experience having sex with older men?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Has anyone been spanked by their parents after becoming an adult?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do the majority of feminists hate men (not all feminists)?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Shedeur Sanders Near-Perfect During Browns Drills on Wednesday - Sports Illustrated
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Omada Health Shares Soar After IPO as GLP-1 Drugs Fuel Interest - WSJ
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Here's One Reason To Buy A Lucid Air Over A Tesla Or Rivian - InsideEVs
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just sitting at home with this huge cock. Who can take care of it for me?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.